2019年6月29日 星期六

2019年6月27日 星期四

美國最高法院做出兩項重大裁決, 將對美國政治產生深遠影響

美國最高法院做出兩項重大裁決 :禁止在人口普查中增加關於公民身份的問題 ;以及裁決憲法並未禁止各州自行劃定選區 ,儘管這給政黨為幫助本黨候選人獲勝而修改選區劃分提供了可能。這兩項裁決觸及美國政治體系如何分配權力的問題, 將對美國政治產生深遠影響 。 (《紐約時報》)

2019年6月26日 星期三

The first Democratic debate kicks off a long primary 2019.6.26

A crowded stageThe first Democratic debate kicks off a long primary

Ten candidates faced each other at an event that was light on heavyweights
THE PACK of Democratic presidential contenders is too big to debate at once. So it must be dealt with in shifts. The first ten debated in Miami on the evening of June 26th for two hours—a second batch arrives on June 27th for a similar slugfest. Although party officials made the placements randomly, it so happened that the first event’s crew was light on heavyweights. Elizabeth Warren, the left-leaning senator from Massachusetts, newly ascendant in the polls, was the clear front-runner, accompanied by nine hangers-on. Each of them was keen to produce break-out moments—of the kind that might fly on social media, inspire cash contributions and bolster campaigns ahead of a months-long slog.
For those predisposed to like Ms Warren, her performance was admirable. Her star shone brightest in the first hour of the debate, where she deplored an economy that is “doing great for a thinner and thinner slice at a top” but “just not doing great for people who are trying to get a prescription filled”. She won loud applause for her defence of Medicare for All, a plan for universal health-care coverage devised by her presidential rival Bernie Sanders. The politicians who oppose it “just won’t fight for it”, she said, but “health care is a basic human right and I will fight for basic human rights”. In the second hour of the debate however, Ms Warren remained relatively quiet, giving her competitors a chance to shine.

Two candidates wound up with more speaking time than Ms Warren: Cory Booker, the New Jersey senator and a gifted orator who used his time well, and Beto O’Rourke, the former Texas congressman and a brief heart-throb of primary voters, who did not. Asked a first question about whether he would support marginal tax rates as high as 70%, Mr O’Rourke decided to start discussing the economy in Spanish. In neither language did he answer the question. Mr O’Rourke was not the only one who adopted that strategy: so did Mr Booker and Julián Castro, the former housing secretary, who also put in a strong performance. The one-issue candidates like Jay Inslee, the governor of Washington, who is running on a platform of fighting climate change, and Tulsi Gabbard, a congresswoman from Hawaii mostly concerned with averting foreign wars, strained to make their views heard. Bill de Blasio, the mayor of New York City who had been roundly mocked for entering the presidential race with his low popularity ratings, proved to be a surprisingly combative and forceful speaker. He suggested that the Democrats had drifted away from their tradition of supporting working-class Americans.
Unlike the previous cycle of Republican debates, which was characterised by personal attacks, the Democrats kept their disagreements civil and confined to policy matters. Much of the two hours was spent with them strenuously agreeing with each other: on the right of women to have abortions, on the necessity of seriously addressing climate change, and on the impropriety of Donald Trump occupying the office of president. Amy Klobuchar, the senator from Minnesota who has sought to occupy the centrist lane of the primary but has found herself supplanted by Joe Biden, the former vice-president, noted her queasiness with proposals for student-debt cancellation and a rapid transition to Medicare for All, which would boot many Americans off their private health-insurance schemes.
Perhaps the most striking rupture was prompted by Mr Castro, who pushed the decriminalisation of illegal immigration—an idea that is out of step even with the party’s base—and challenged his fellow contenders to endorse that too. Majorities of Americans tend to support Democrats on issues like health care and climate change; immigration is an area more easily exploited by Mr Trump. “Watching that image of Oscar and his daughter Valencia is heartbreaking,” Mr Castro said of the horrific image, recently published, of a drowned father and daughter from El Salvador who died while trying to get to America. “It should also piss us all off”.
A fuller showing comes on June 27th when the remaining favourites—including Mr Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, and Bernie Sanders—will tussle. Watching his possible challengers, Mr Trump did not appear to be fazed in the slightest. “BORING!” he tweeted a mere 35 minutes in. Perhaps he will be more excited by the second debate.

2019年6月23日 星期日

Elizabeth Warren Has an Answer for Everything. Is That Enough?

Elizabeth Warren Has an Answer for Everything. Is That Enough? She's running. A Fighting Chance by Elizabeth Warren 2014;不大好笑的人生:伊莉莎白.華倫卯上華爾街的真實故事 2018;兼談所謂書摘

Allies See a Familiar Pattern in Trump’s Iran Reversal. Trump Shrugs Off Khashoggi Killing by Ally Saudi Arabia

Allies See a Familiar Pattern in Trump’s Iran Reversal


The move intensified global doubts about the president’s judgment and the power wielded by the United States. But some analysts also praised Mr. Trump’s restraint.


U.S. FOREIGN POLICY

2019年6月22日 星期六

Who Gets to Own the West? Ted Turner 及其他大富豪


也許是3年前,美國 CNN 訪問其創始人Ted Turner - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Turner

他當時買下大面積的美國*
*Through Turner Enterprises, he owns 15 ranches in KansasMontanaNebraskaNew MexicoOklahoma, and South Dakota.[51][52] Totaling 1,910,585 acres (7,731.86 km2), his land-holdings across America make Turner one of the largest individual landowners in North America (by acreage).[52]



Who Gets to Own the West?


  • A small group of billionaires is buying vast parcels in states like Idaho and Colorado, shaking up the landscape.
  • Many local residents see these new owners as a threat to a way of life beloved for its access to the outdoors.

Michael Bloomberg announces $50M investment to address opioid epidemic in the U.S. The Family That Built an Empire of Pain. “The first great novel of the opioid epidemic.”


小說與現實

Available in paperback on Tuesday
"The important thing is don't act like you robbed a bank.
Act like you have places to go and people to see.
Act like you love the police. 
Act like you never did drugs.
Act like you love America so much it's retarded.
But don't act like you robbed a bank.
And don't run.
The important thing is don't run."
--from CHERRY (2018) by Nico Walker
NATIONAL BESTSELLER
A PEN/HEMINGWAY AWARD FINALIST
A NEW YORK TIMES NOTABLE BOOK
ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR: THE NEW YORKER • ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY • VULTURE • VOGUE • LIT HUB
“A miracle of literary serendipity, a triumph.” —The Washington Post
A young medic returns from deployment in Iraq to two things: the woman he loves, and the opioid crisis sweeping across the Midwest. Soon deep in the thrall of heroin addiction, he arrives at what seems like the only logical solution: robbing banks. Written by a singularly talented, wildly imaginative debut novelist, Cherry is a bracingly funny and unexpectedly tender work of fiction straight from the dark heart of America.
“The first great novel of the opioid epidemic.” —Vulture
Read more HERE: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/…/561963/cherry-by-nico…/



2018.12.5

The funds will support a first-of-its-kind partnership between states, the Centers for Disease Control, Johns Hopkins University, and other organizations to improve treatment and prevention programs, develop novel interventions, and share the most effective solutions.

HUB.JHU.EDU
New CDC figures show recent decline in U.S. life expectancy tied to record number of drug…






----
An opioid addicted baby is now born every half hour. In Huntington, West Virginia, ten per cent of newborns are dependent on opioids.

NEWYORKER.COM

The Family That Built an Empire of Pain
The Sackler dynasty’s ruthless marketing of painkillers has generated billions of dollars—and millions of addicts.

2019年6月18日 星期二

美國軍方尋求阻止中國實體涉足國家安全機構的新舉措;美國和伊朗各握有兩大籌碼


美國國防部計劃要求供應商加強網絡防護,並采取措施支撐一些陷入財務困境的供應商的資產負債表,國防部擔心中國可能利用這些供應商的弱點獲取關鍵技術。
美國五角大樓負責采辦與保障的副部長Ellen Lord周一在巴黎航展上表示:“我們非常擔心中國對我們工業基礎的投資。”
她表示,這類外國投資“正在侵蝕我們國防工業基礎的安全。”五角大樓把未來的科技創新寄托在一些中小型公司身上,這些公司往往被這類外國資本盯上。
這是美國軍方阻止中國實體涉足美國國家安全機構的最新舉措。2018年,五角大樓宣布禁止華為和中興通訊在美軍基地的零售店銷售手機,稱這些設備可能構成安全威脅。


**
伊朗周一宣稱濃縮鈾庫存將突破上限,這幾乎完美揭示出海灣地區緊張局勢迅速升級背後的真正原因。雙方並非大步走向戰爭,而是在進行一場籌碼爭奪戰:一方面川普政府相比伊朗擁有了相當多的籌碼,另一方面伊朗感覺其迫切需要贏得籌碼以平衡這種情況。
這並不意味著不會爆發戰爭——錯判的幾率很高且不斷上升,只是說戰爭實際上並非雙方想要的結果。這種對峙風險很高,就像一場學校里的對峙那樣,兩邊的孩子都希望通過顯示自己準備跨過土里的界線,從而可以避免實際上過線的必要。
周一這種對峙變得更加危險,伊朗宣布將很快超過2015年與美國和其他幾大強國達成的核協議規定的濃縮鈾庫存上限。此舉目的顯然在恐嚇歐洲國家,威脅這些國家反對美國對伊朗的經濟制裁。歐洲國家非常希望能夠挽救2015年的核協議。實際上伊朗表示,若歐洲國家兌現之前的承諾,搭建一個可以幫助伊朗繞過美國制裁的金融體系,可能撤回其濃縮鈾決定。
在這輪對峙中,美國和伊朗各握有兩大籌碼。川普政府已經展示其擁有嚴重破壞伊朗經濟的經濟實力,以及迫使其他國家合作的外交實力。

2019年6月17日 星期一

Push to impeach Trump stalls amid Democrats’ deference to — and fear of — Pelosi

Colleagues say there is a deep well of respect for the political wisdom of the most powerful woman in American politics — and concern that challenging her comes with the risk of grave cost to one’s career.