2016年12月31日 星期六

A Celebration of American Innovation: AMERICA THE INGENIOUS How a Nation of Dreamers, Immigrants, and Tinkerers Changed the World

Photo
American ingenuity: A stretch of the transcontinental railroad. CreditArchive Photos/Getty Images
AMERICA THE INGENIOUS
How a Nation of Dreamers, Immigrants, and Tinkerers Changed the World
By Kevin Baker
Illustrated by Chris Dent
262 pp. Artisan. $29.95.
Kevin Baker offers a collection of easy, fast-to-read vignettes illustrating the inventiveness of the American people, mainly from the Industrial Revolution to today. In a now popular genre established by Neil MacGregor’s “A History of the World in 100 Objects,” he focuses on 76 innovations or creations, ranging from the Erie Canal to jazz, from the transcontinental railroad to the microprocessor. Each selection gets about 1,000-1,500 words and, in feature journalism style, provides a what, who, when, why and how of the innovation and its impact. Accompanied by sidebar factoids and cartoonish line drawings, the book seems aimed at young adults, serving up interesting bits of history in a Wiki-lite fashion.
The accounts are straightforward and informative without much in-depth context or treatment of historical or biographical nuance — and there’s no mistaking this for a scholarly treatment. Why 76 cases of ingenuity? No real reason. And why these? Pretty arbitrary. The selections are broken up into categories — roaming, building, curing, playing and so on — which is fair enough. But one wonders about the absence of some key categories of American creativity — like electing, financing, protesting, educating, conserving, cooking and loving.
The categories thus composed obviate the need for a chronological progression, but even thematically, the narrative connection between one selection and another is unclear. Within categories there are puzzling omissions. History ends too soon in “Fighting” — there are no F-15s or drones. With regard to “Powering,” i.e., energy, nuclear is absent. “Producing,” i.e., agriculture, ends curiously, or perhaps ironically, with channeling irrigation from farmland to meeting the needs of a growing Los Angeles. There’s a curious category — “Women Inventors” — with only two selections, but women’s contributions edge in at a few other points — perhaps expectedly with the bra, dishwasher and diapers, but also informatively with Kevlar and the Laserphaco probe. Equal rights might also have made a good choice. As a native New Yorker I was personally O.K. with the bias toward that city — but objectively the inclusion of the Polo Grounds, Penn Station, the subway, Coney Island, and the Hudson and East River tunnels seems a bit too parochial.
What explains the American penchant for creativity, invention and innovation? Baker asserts it’s because the United States is the original and exemplary nation of modernity — founded and energized by the very idea of ingenuity. As the book’s subtitle suggests, ingenuity is somehow baked into American individualism, national character and social life. Baker sums up the causes of America’s ingenuity in familiar fashion, almost canonical among innovation stump speakers. American ingenuity thrives on the freedom to explore and create, the pursuit of equality of opportunity, the appreciation of teamwork, the orientation to foster public involvement — inviting investors and serving consumers — as well as government encouragement, leadership and patent regulation.
This particular set of qualities has long been part of American self-consciousness, noted especially by de Tocqueville in his insightful study of our “can do” society. Establishing correlations, causality and logical interpretation for why innovation occurs has occupied much social science theory and research — to mixed results. Sometimes invention emerges from quirky, stubborn isolation and greed, and unfortunately sometimes from repressive, authoritarian and totalitarian regimes. If America has proved particularly fertile for ingenuity, though, the reasons won’t be found in this pleasant but superficial book.

2016年12月28日 星期三

Robert Reich recommend Obama to make the following parting shots

Trump is accusing Obama of putting up “roadblocks” to a smooth transition. In reality, I think President Obama has been too cooperative. In the next 23 days, I'd recommend he make the following parting shots:
1. Name Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution gives the President authority to fill vacancies during a Senate recess. This includes filling a Supreme Court vacancy: Justice William Brennan began his tenure with a recess appointment in 1956. Any appointments made this way would expire at the end of the next Senate session. So a Garland appointment made on January 3 would last until December 2017, the end of the first session of the 115th Congress.
2. Use his pardon authority to forgive the past and future civil immigration offenses of the nearly 750,000 young people granted legal status under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Dream) program. Without an immigration offense on their records, they could more easily apply for legal status.
3. Impose economic sanctions on Russia for interfering in the 2016 presidential election, including blocking all further loans or investments by Russian nationals in all real estate in the United States.
4. Instruct all cabinet departments and agencies not to respond to any Trump transition team inquiry that might intimidate any individual members of the civil service.
5. Issue an executive order protecting the independence of all government fact-finding agencies: The Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Energy Information. (Trump could repeal the order, but that would be politically costly.)
6. Issue an executive order protecting the independence of all Inspectors General in every cabinet department and agency. (Ditto.)
7. Issue a report showing which states' citizens will most benefit from tax cuts going to the richest Americans and largest corporations (overwhelmingly blue states), and which states will lose the most from cuts in Medicaid and repeal of Obamacare (overwhelmingly red states), along with estimates of such gains and losses.
8. Other actions?
What do you think?

2016年12月27日 星期二

Lincoln–Douglas debates


此書有漢譯

Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the ... - Amazon.com

https://www.amazon.com/Crisis-House-Divided...Lincoln-Douglas/dp/0226391183
Crisis of the House Divided is the standard historiography of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Harry Jaffaprovides the definitive analysis of the political principles ...

Harry Jaffa's Affair With The Lincoln-Douglas Debates - Forbes

www.forbes.com/.../henry-jaffa-lincoln-douglas-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson....
Jul 17, 2009 - One day in 1946, Harry Jaffa wandered into a used bookstore in Manhattan and picked up a copy of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. “I fell in love ...

[PDF]crisis of the house divided - Teaching American History

teachingamericanhistory.org/files/2013/08/crisisofthehousedivided.pdf
CRISIS OF. THE HOUSE. DIVIDED. An Interpretation of the Issues in the. Lincoln-DouglasDebates. HARRY V. JAFFA. Doubkday b. Company, Inc., Garden.

Lincoln–Douglas debates - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LincolnDouglas_debates
The LincolnDouglas Debates of 1858 were a series of seven debates between Abraham ..... Jaffa, Harry V. (2009). Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation ...

Harry V. Jaffa - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_V._Jaffa
Jump to Debate with Thomas DiLorenzo - Jaffa and Thomas DiLorenzo debated each other on May 7, ... The Lincoln-Douglas DebatesJaffa argued that ...

2016年12月25日 星期日

Trump Decries His Foundation's Closure, Overstating Its Giving. Trump Family Hurries to Resolve Business Ties


NPR

Donald J. Trump falsely claimed that "100%" of the money raised by his foundation went to "wonderful charities." He also has not personally donated to the foundation since 2008.
Trump blasted the media for not reporting on his charitable giving through the foundation.
NPR.ORG



At the Trump Organization, Business Is a Family Affair

  • An examination of Donald J. Trump’s company reveals a distinctly family business fortified with longtime loyalists.
  • With a big reach and a bigger self-image, the relatively small company has come under intense scrutiny as its chief prepares to become president of the United States.

Trump Family Hurries to Resolve Business Ties

Mr. Trump has agreed to shut his charity, weighed a plan for an outside monitor to oversee the Trump Organization and ended some international business projects.

2016年12月23日 星期五

US allows UN Security Council to condemn Israeli settlements

US allows UN Security Council to condemn Israeli settlements
INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

U.N. Votes to Condemn Israel Settlements as U.S. Abstains

  • The Obama administration allowed the Security Council to adopt a resolution that condemns Israeli settlement construction.
  • The decision not to veto broke an American tradition of serving as Israel’s diplomatic shield, and defied pressure by President-elect Donald J. Trump and Israel.

2016年12月22日 星期四

Health Plan Sign-Ups Rise Even as G.O.P. Plans Its Repeal

Health Plan Sign-Ups Rise Even as G.O.P. Plans Its Repeal

  • The Obama administration said 6.4 million people had signed up so far for health insurance for 2017 despite the program’s uncertain future.

  • The new sign-ups — an increase of 400,000 over a similar point last year — could undermine the argument that the law is in free fall.

2016年12月21日 星期三

川普選後不再"排去(華盛頓)沼澤地的水"Drain the swamp,他更盡快放進鱷魚群



Drain the swamp is a term which has been used by American politicians. The term alludes to the historical draining of swamps to keep mosquito populations low to combat malaria.
"排去沼澤地的水"是美國政客使用的一個術語。 該術語暗示了過去的做法:將沼澤地的水排除,降低蚊子數量來消除瘧疾。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drain_the_swamp
Newt Gingrich, a Trump confidante who helped create the Washington swamp when he was Speaker of the House in the 1990s, said this morning that Trump isn’t any longer aiming to “drain the Washington swamp.” The phrase “was cute, but he doesn't want to use it anymore," says Gingrich.
Why not? During his campaign, Trump repeatedly vowed to "drain the swamp" -- leading chants of the phrase at his rallies. It was part of Trump's anti-establishment, anti-Washington message, based on rooting out corruption and bringing an outsider's perspective to government.
But since the election, critics (such as yours truly) have used the phrase to assail Trump's high-level appointments -- Wall Street financiers (like former Goldman Sachs executive Steven Mnuchin for Treasury Secretary), top corporate executives (like Rex Tillerson, the CEO of ExxonMobil for Secretary of State) and Washington insiders (like Sen. Jeff Sessions for Attorney General) – all of whom have been among the biggest of Washington's swamp dwellers.
So Trump won’t any longer be draining the swamp. To the contrary, he’s adding alligators as fast as he can. How long will it be before his supporters notice?
What do you think?
"Drain the swamp" was a refrain of Donald Trump's presidential campaign, but Newt Gingrich says the president-elect "doesn't want to use it anymore" now that he's knee deep in swamp water.
CNN.COM|由 DAVID WRIGHT 上傳





美國民主的潰爛非止一日(保羅·克魯格曼)

看官請查保羅·克魯格曼何許人也! 名經濟學者!

但是,如果還有任何拯救的希望的話,那就必須先從清晰地認識到現在的情況是多麼糟糕開始。美國民主正處於危急關頭。


美國政治的弊病並非始於川普,就像羅馬共和國的弊病也並非始於凱撒。民主根基已經腐爛了幾十年,共和體制的表象仍在,但專制已經崛起,而且難以阻擋。
現在,美國也可能蛻變成一黨制國家。美國民主正處於危急關頭。
(本文是時報專欄文章,作者為保羅·克魯格曼。)
我們今天的局面就像羅馬共和國末期,共和體制的表象仍在,但專制已經崛起,而且難以阻擋。現在,美國也可能蛻變成一黨制國家。
CN.NYTIMES.COM


2016年12月19日 星期一

川普正式當選;川普是普丁的哈巴狗 (紀思道);報導:中國不喜歡川普說中國"偷盜"美國的潛航器。還就還!


動態消息










AFP News Agency

America's Electoral College confirms Donald Trump's election as the 45th president of the United States, unswayed by a last-ditch bid by die-hard opponents to bar the Republican's path to the White House. Read more: http://u.afp.com/4iui










~~~~
報導:中國不喜歡川普說中國"偷盜"美國的潛航器。還就還!


潜航器事件之后,美国为何低调应对

JANE PERLEZ
俘获美军潜航器的举动被认为是中国对候任总统特朗普的挑战。美国仅通过外交渠道悄悄交涉,暴露了华盛顿在亚太问题上的决心不足,可能会让中国更加大胆。


~~~~

如果CIA是對的,那麼俄羅斯似乎試圖令這樣一位總統當選——準確地說,他並不是傀儡,但或許更像是條哈巴狗,一條俄羅斯貴賓狗。
這條俄羅斯貴賓狗正在顯露自己的本性,讓莫斯科的朋友們出任重要的政府職務,這實際上等於酬謝莫斯科攻擊美國。
(本文為時報專欄,作者是紀思道。)


俄羅斯駭客嚴重破壞了美國的制度,試圖影響大選結果。現在,川普反倒為俄羅斯辯護,並把親俄的人安插進他的內閣。
CN.NYTIMES.COM

2016年12月18日 星期日

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars


Not all academics agree that slavery was the driving force behind the Electoral College, though many agree there’s a connection.
A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to…
PBS.ORG

The Electoral College Meets Monday. Donald J. Trump 插曲:不開記者新聞會的弊病;The Obama Legacy: Place-Based Poverty



Unlike other ways of getting messages out, press conferences hold public officials more accountable because they have to answer questions in an uncontrolled environment.



Trump hasn't held a press conference since July, opting instead for frequent tweets and the occasional interview. Presidents elect typically take…
NPR.ORG





Donald J. Trump is putting all of the Obama administration’s place-based work (and more) is at risk, writes Peter Edelman. "The Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, SNAP, housing vouchers and many more critical programs all face the prospect of being totally axed or turned into block grants — either way, it means far less people having access to basic needs like food, housing and healthcare." We want to know: What do you think citizens should do, if anything, in response to this?






Donald J. Trump(謝票也者,重複說,要讓美國團結、強大;要築高牆阻非法移民、drugs.....又,補充:美國各選舉人團下周一集會,可能"謀反"......) 正在現場直播。Join me live in Hershey, Pennsylvania! (這地方我1988年去過一次。)


The Electoral College’s 538 members gather Monday at 50 state capitols to cast the ballots that matter the most when it comes to electing a U.S.…
BLOOMBERG.COM

The Electoral College Meets Monday. Here’s What to Expect.

  • A group of 538 electors will meet in state capitols across the country, chosen by their parties to cast votes for president and vice president.
  • Although the meetings are usually a formality, the loss by President-elect Donald J. Trump in the popular vote has renewed a focus on the electoral tally.




Affluence of this magnitude in a US presidential cabinet is unprecedented.





Donald J. Trump
If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?

Russia Hackers Tough to Find, and Tougher to Prosecute

  • Russia says American efforts to capture hackers may violate international law and it has shown that it will not be easily influenced by public shaming.
  • “You can indict 400 people. They don’t care,” a former F.B.I. senior executive said.


《新苏黎世报》记者认为,台湾应该得到西方国家更多的支持,而不仅仅是一通电话而已。





  • 焦點評論:川普挑戰北京一中原則的盤...
  • 川普的「一中風暴」給台灣的啟示(楊...